Case 4100950/2016 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4100950/2016 Mr J Mclaughlin v Wood Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100950/2016
- Decision date
- 4 July 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4100950/2016 Mr J Mclaughlin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J McLaughlin presented the claim in person against Wood Group at Aberdeen. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying dispute. It states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant.
Because the claim had been withdrawn, Employment Judge Nicol M Hosie dismissed it under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any findings on liability, any remedy award, or any reasons dealing with the merits of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.