Case 4100965/2016 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100965/2016 Mr B Smit v Represented by: Mr P Lefevre Solicitor Motive Offshore Group Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100965/2016
- Decision date
- 10 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr Ian
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100965/2016 Mr B Smit
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a one-page judgment in Mr B Smit v Motive Offshore Group Limited, case 4100965/2016, dated 10 March 2017. The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and therefore dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on liability, unfair dismissal issues, or remedy, and it does not record any monetary award. It also records that the claimant was represented by Mr P Lefevre, solicitor, and the respondents by Ms H Bloodworth, solicitor, with Employment Judge Mr Ian McFatridge signing the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal record states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.