Case 4100967/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100967/2012 Mrs L Scotland v Represented by: Thompsons Clackmannanshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100967/2012
- Decision date
- 10 October 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100967/2012 Mrs L Scotland
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed as Mrs L Scotland v Clackmannanshire Council, case number 4100967/2012. The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and therefore was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or legal issues are set out in the text provided. The decision is limited to the procedural disposal of the withdrawn claim on 10 October 2017 by Employment Judge Frances Eccles.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.