Case 4100972/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100972/2012 Miss T Rybak v Represented by: Thompsons Clackmannanshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100972/2012
- Decision date
- 12 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100972/2012 Miss T Rybak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment for Miss T Rybak v Clackmannanshire Council records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or any disputed facts are set out in the extracted text. The judgment is dated 12 December 2017 and was entered in the register and copied to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive liability findings are set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.