Case 4100977/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Harvey v Servent Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100977/2025
- Decision date
- 18 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Harvey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by video conference in Glasgow on 5 November 2025 before Employment Judge Campbell. The claim was brought by Mr R Harvey against Servent Limited and was treated as an unlawful deduction from wages claim under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that the claim was not presented within the required period under section 23(2)(a) of the Act, namely three months from the date of the alleged deduction from the claimant’s wages. On that basis, it found the claim was out of time.
The tribunal also found that the claimant did not meet the requirements of section 23(4) of the Act. The claim was therefore dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim was not presented within the three-month period under section 23(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was therefore out of time, and that the claimant did not meet the requirements of section 23(4). | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 23(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.