Case 4100979/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100979/2019 Mr C Sadler v Markinch Limited T/A Banners House — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100979/2019
- Decision date
- 13 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Meiklejohn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100979/2019 Mr C Sadler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Alexander Meiklejohn issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £2,146.19.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £872.00. The judgment records no additional remedy components beyond these two sums. The date of judgment is 12 March 2019, entered in the register on 13 March 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No response was presented. The Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material and ordered payment of £2,146.19 for unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,146 |
| Holiday pay | No response was presented. The Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material and ordered payment of £872.00 for failed holiday entitlement payment. | Upheld | — | £872 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,018
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.