Case 4100986/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Chisholm v Ness Drinks Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 4100986/2026
- Decision date
- 17 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Chisholm
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNess Drinks Ltd presented no response to the claim. Employment Judge A Kemp issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss T Chisholm's wages by failing to pay the full amount due. It awarded £1,440 gross, calculated as 96 hours at £15 per hour.
The tribunal also found that unpaid holiday entitlement constituted an unauthorised deduction from wages. It awarded £600 gross for 10 days of holiday at four hours per day and £15 per hour. It further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, awarding £600 in damages representing two weeks' gross pay at 20 hours per week and £15 per hour.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have the appropriate service to proceed. The three monetary awards totalled £2,640 gross. The judgment permitted deductions for income tax and employee National Insurance contributions where required by law, provided the respondent remitted those sums to HMRC and supplied the claimant with written evidence of the deductions and remittance. Payment of the remaining balance would then satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross unpaid wages, calculated as 96 hours at £15 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement constituted an unauthorised deduction from wages. The gross award covered 10 days at four hours per day and £15 per hour. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages represented two weeks' gross pay, calculated at 20 hours per week and £15 per hour. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant did not have the appropriate service to proceed with this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,640
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.