Case 4101023/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v CSC Interiors Ltd (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101023/2022
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 24 August 2022 the Tribunal wrote to Mr D McDonald asking him to confirm, for the avoidance of doubt, whether he was withdrawing his claim after his correspondence of 17 August 2022. No reply was received.
On 8 September 2022 the Tribunal gave Mr McDonald an opportunity to provide written reasons by 22 September 2022, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. No reply was received. The Tribunal found that he had failed to give an acceptable reason why a strike-out should not be made and had not requested a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. No substantive merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying substantive claims were not determined on their merits in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.