Case 4101026/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nathan Charles v Knights Roofing & Joinery Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101026/2022
- Decision date
- 10 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nathan Charles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the merits hearing in Edinburgh on 5 August 2022, Employment Judge Porter held that Mr Nathan Charles had been unfairly dismissed under s103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondents were absent. The judgment records no discrimination findings and states that all other claims were dismissed. On remedy, the tribunal awarded a compensatory award of £3,750, plus £612.50 notice pay, £300 holiday pay and £2,887.50 unpaid wages. The judgment says those sums were inclusive of a 25% uplift under s207A of TULR(C)A 1992. It also ordered £1,960, described as four weeks' net pay under s38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total award was £9,510.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Tribunal held the claimant was unfairly dismissed under s103A ERA 1996; all other claims were dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,510
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,750
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s103A ERA 1996
- s207A of TULR(C)A 1992
- s38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.