Case 4101043/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4101043/2025 Mr L Taylor v The Sun Inn — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101043/2025
- Decision date
- 4 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4101043/2025 Mr L Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under rule 22 on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge Jones recorded that the respondent, The Sun Inn, had not defended the claim. On that basis, the tribunal issued judgment for the claimant, Mr L Taylor, on the material before it.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,782.71 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to comply with the requirement to make payment of tips and ordered payment of £140.00 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,100.00 gross. The total gross sum awarded was therefore £3,022.71. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or any other remedy beyond these three sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,782.71 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,783 |
| Other | The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to comply with the requirement to make payment of tips and ordered payment of £140.00 gross. No more specific taxonomy matched this claim on the face of the judgment. | Upheld | — | £140 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,100.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,023
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.