Case 4101057/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J McTaggart v Bars Holding Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101057/2025
- Decision date
- 25 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J McTaggart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Glasgow by CVP on 12 September 2025, Employment Judge F Eccles found that Mr J McTaggart was unfairly dismissed by Bars Holding Ltd. The judgment records a basic award of £2,930.40, calculated as 12 weeks at £244.20, and a compensatory award of £2,453.60.
The tribunal also ordered statutory notice pay of £1,709.40, calculated as 7 weeks at £244.20. The short judgment text does not set out further factual findings or reasoning beyond the dismissal finding and the awards made, and it was sent to the parties on 25 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £2,930.40 plus a compensatory award of £2,453.60. | Upheld | — | £5,384 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment also ordered statutory notice pay of £1,709.40 (7 weeks x £244.20). The extract does not separately label the claim, but the notice pay award is stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,709 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,093
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,930
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,454
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.