Case 4101080/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101080/2022 and 4101081/2022 Mr G Stojak Mr M McDonald v CSC Interiors Ltd (In Liquidation) c/o FRP ADVISORY TRADING Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101080/2022
- Decision date
- 18 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101080/2022 and 4101081/2022 Mr G Stojak Mr M McDonald
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity on 8 November 2022 to provide written reasons by 15 November 2022, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claims should not be struck out. The judgment records that no acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that they had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). No substantive merits findings or remedy awards were made. The judgment is dated 17 November 2022 and was sent to the parties on 18 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment disposes of claims in case numbers 4101080/2022 and 4101081/2022 together. It does not identify the substantive heads of claim in the text provided; it states only that the claims were struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.