Case 4101102/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Hamilton v Campers Scotland Limited (In Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 4101102/2025
- Decision date
- 6 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Hamilton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge P O'Donnell issued judgment on the available material under rule 22. No response had been presented within the applicable time limit. The respondent was in compulsory liquidation, but the relevant court granted permission for the continuation of the proceedings on 2 March 2026.
The Tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to bring the claim because the complaint concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives and the claimant was an employee dismissed as redundant. It held that the complaints that the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well founded.
The Tribunal found that the respondent dismissed as redundant more than 20 employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less. It found that the respondent failed to ensure employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188.
The Tribunal made a protective award in respect of employees based at Unit A, West Mains Industrial Estate, Grangemouth FK3 8YE. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period, beginning on 24 December 2024 and lasting for 90 days. The judgment did not state a monetary total or split any award by individual claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment concerns a protective award for failure to comply with collective redundancy consultation and employee representative election requirements under sections 188 and 188A of TULRCA 1992. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category, and no individual redundancy payment claim was adjudicated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 188A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.