Case 4101108/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4101108/2025 Miss T Akkari v Edwards Bar and Grill — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101108/2025
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4101108/2025 Miss T Akkari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Sangster issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £749.38.
The judgment also records that the unfair dismissal claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. That claim was dismissed under rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. No separate award was made for the unfair dismissal claim, and the judgment does not record any other monetary components beyond the holiday pay sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and orders payment of the net sum of £749.38. | Upheld | — | £749 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that this claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £749
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.