Case 4101109/2023 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101109/2023 (P)5 Held at Aberdeen on July 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr R McDonald v Waves Radio Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101109/2023
- Decision date
- 4 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101109/2023 (P)5 Held at Aberdeen on July 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr R McDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRalph McDonald brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act. The tribunal recorded that, despite assurances from the respondent, the wages admittedly due to the claimant were never paid.
The claimant told the tribunal by email on 4 March 2023 that the wages due amounted to £4,869.45. The respondent had submitted a response form but stated that the claim was not disputed. After the tribunal emailed on 21 July 2023 saying it was minded to issue judgment for the sum claimed unless an objection was received within seven days, no objection was received. The tribunal therefore found the claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £4,869.45 as unlawful deductions from wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent stated in its Response Form that the claim was not disputed. | Upheld | — | £4,869 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,869
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.