Case 4101127/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Robertson v Plant Blonde Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101127/2025
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge L Doherty issued a judgment under rule 22 on the available material. The tribunal found that Plant Blonde Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs N Robertson’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £2,333.97, said to relate to February and March 2025 after credit for payments already made and a notified deduction from pay.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,044 gross, calculated as 87 hours of accrued but untaken annual leave at £12 per hour. The judgment records no other heads of claim or separate element of interest, and the total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £3,377.97.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment on the available material; ordered payment of the net sum for February and March 2025, less payments already made and a notified deduction from pay. | Upheld | — | £2,334 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 judgment on the available material; ordered payment of the gross sum for 87 hours' accrued but untaken annual leave at £12 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,044 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,378
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.