Case 4101136/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101136/20225 Held at Aberdeen on March 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr A Burr v Aberdeen Day Project Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101136/2022
- Decision date
- 20 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101136/20225 Held at Aberdeen on March 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr A Burr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on disability status in a claim brought by Mr A Burr against Aberdeen Day Project Ltd t/a The Bread Maker. The relevant period was January 2022, leading up to the claimant's dismissal on 16 January 2022. The tribunal had to decide whether he had a physical or mental impairment within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
The claimant relied on back, neck and hip pain, depression and anxiety, and possible autism. The tribunal accepted that he had experienced intermittent back and neck problems following an earlier injury, and it considered chiropractic reports and limited GP material, but it found that the evidence did not show a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities or a long-term effect. It noted that the symptoms appeared to fluctuate and to arise after particular events such as heavy lifting or sleeping in his car.
On depression and anxiety, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had experienced periods when he felt depressed, including after a row with his mother at Christmas 2021, but it found no sufficient evidence of an underlying long-term depressive illness or recurrent disabling effect. On autism, the tribunal noted that there was no formal diagnosis and that the claimant had not yet been assessed, so there was insufficient evidence of the level of difficulty or the effect on day-to-day activities.
Taking the conditions separately and cumulatively, the tribunal held that the claimant had not demonstrated that he was disabled for the purposes of section 6 at the relevant time. It therefore dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue hearing on whether the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time in January 2022; tribunal held he was not. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2(2) Equality Act 2010
- Tesco Stores Ltd v Tennant
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth
- Swift v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Constabulary
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.