Case 4101153/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Reynolds And [40] others Hotelfone Limited (in Liquidation) c/o Begbies Traynor Ltd The Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Represented by: Mr W Bolling Solicitor — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101153/2025
- Decision date
- 19 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Reynolds And [40] others Hotelfone Limited (in Liquidation) c/o Begbies Traynor Ltd The Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe first respondent, Hotelfone Limited (in liquidation), employed 41 employees at its Bridge of Weir site. The claimants were dismissed as redundant on 13 March 2025, when joint liquidators were appointed and the business ceased trading. The tribunal found there was no recognised trade union or other representative body in the workplace, and that the first respondent did not carry out any meaningful consultation with the claimants about the redundancies or the election of employee representatives.
The tribunal accepted the first claimant's evidence as credible and reliable. It found that more than 20 employees were dismissed at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, that the first respondent failed to ensure the election of employee representatives as required by section 188A, and that there were no special circumstances making such elections not reasonably practicable. The complaint under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was therefore well founded.
A protective award was made under section 189 of the 1992 Act for 90 days' pay, effective from 13 March 2025, covering all employees dismissed as redundant at the first respondent's only establishment. The tribunal also ordered payment of the appropriate remuneration for that protective period under section 190 of the Act.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Collective consultation/protective award claim under sections 188, 188A, 189 and 190 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the tribunal found the complaint well founded and made a 90-day protective award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- sections 188 and 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- special circumstances not reasonably practicable
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 190 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.