Case 4101175/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101175/2015 Mr P McCallion v Waukesha Bearings Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4101175/2015
- Decision date
- 22 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101175/2015 Mr P McCallion
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 28 May 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 11 June 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The judgment is a procedural strike-out order and does not contain any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment itself does not restate the pleaded claim category in the short reasons; classification follows the case listing. The claim was struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment itself does not restate the pleaded claim category in the short reasons; classification follows the case listing. The claim was struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.