Case 4101184/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Fisher v Purplebricks Property Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 4101184/2026
- Decision date
- 23 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Fisher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Miss M Fisher's complaints against Purplebricks Property Limited of unfair dismissal and failure to pay holiday entitlement. The claim form was sent to the respondent on 12 May 2026, but the respondent did not enter a response within the 28 days required by rule 17 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The judgment was made under rule 22. The judge found that liability could properly be determined on the available material without a hearing.
The tribunal awarded £5,854.83 in compensation for unfair dismissal. This comprised £5,113.86 for six months' loss arising from the difference in salary in the claimant's new employment, £240.97 for three months' pension loss and £500 for loss of statutory rights. No basic award was made because the claimant had received a redundancy payment from the respondent. The tribunal also ordered payment of £457.87 for five days' holiday entitlement. The two awards total £6,312.70.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,855 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £458 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,313
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,855
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 17 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.