Case 4101188/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P McKee v Donald Ross Residential Factoring Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101188/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P McKee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningProceeding under rule 21 because no response had been presented, the Employment Judge decided the claim on the available material and held that Mr P McKee was unfairly dismissed by Donald Ross Residential Factoring Limited.
The tribunal awarded £14,129.58 in compensation, made up of a £1,575 basic award and a £12,554.58 compensatory award. The compensatory award was calculated from past loss of earnings of £6,580.00, loss of pension of £205.26, future losses of £4,128.00, loss of statutory rights of £500.00, and a 10% uplift of £1,141.32. The judgment stated that there was no jurisdiction to include compensation for reputational damage.
In addition, the respondent was ordered to pay £1,872 to the claimant by way of expenses.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment with no response presented. Compensation comprised a basic award of £1,575 and a compensatory award of £12,554.58. | Upheld | — | £14,130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,002
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,575
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £12,555
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.