Case 4101194/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Durim Lushaku v Prezzo Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101194/2020
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Durim Lushaku
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by CVP on 31 August 2020 before Employment Judge M Whitcombe. Mr Durim Lushaku appeared in person and Prezzo Limited was represented by Ms E Mannion, solicitor.
The only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The Tribunal decided it had no jurisdiction to hear that complaint because it had been presented outside the applicable time limit. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been presented within the time limit.
The Tribunal further found that the claim was not presented within a reasonable further period after the expiry of the time limit. Oral reasons were given in the presence of the parties and there was no request for written reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint because it was presented outside the applicable time limit; it found it was reasonably practicable to have presented the complaint within that time limit and that it was not presented within a reasonable further period after expiry. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.