Case 4101202/2012 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4101202/2012 Mr Fraser Grubb Executor for Mrs C Grubb v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitors Highland Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101202/2012
- Decision date
- 8 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4101202/2012 Mr Fraser Grubb Executor for Mrs C Grubb
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a one-page Employment Tribunal (Scotland) judgment in case 4101202/2012, Mr Fraser Grubb Executor for Mrs C Grubb v Highland Council. The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No merits findings were made and no remedy was awarded.
Employment Judge Ian McFatridge signed the judgment on 08 May 2019, and it was entered in the register and copied to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the 2013 Rules. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.