Case 4101202/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Reid & others as per attached schedule v Watt Brothers (Glasgow And Edinburgh) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101202/2020
- Decision date
- 1 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Reid & others as per attached schedule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after no response was presented. Employment Judge L Wiseman found the claim well founded on the available material.
The tribunal held that the respondent was under a duty to consult about redundancies under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and failed to do so. It therefore made a protective award in respect of all employees made redundant by the respondent and listed on the attached schedule.
The judgment states that the protected period began on 18 October 2019 and lasted for 90 days. The extracted text does not record a separate monetary figure for the award, only the order for remuneration for the protected period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal made a protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for employees listed in the attached schedule. The extracted text does not state a separate monetary sum for the award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.