Case 4101243/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101243/2023 Miss R Kilgour v Rujia Marketing Consultants Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101243/2023
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101243/2023 Miss R Kilgour
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented, so the Employment Judge issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Rujia Marketing Consultants Ltd had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £159 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars and ordered payment of £440.10, described as two weeks' gross pay at £202.05 per week.
The total award was therefore £599.10. The hearing listed for 21 April 2023 was cancelled. No separate legal test was set out in the short judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £159 gross. | Upheld | — | £159 |
| Other | Respondent failed to provide a statement of employment particulars; ordered to pay £440.10, described as two weeks' gross pay at £202.05 per week. | Upheld | — | £440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £599
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.