Case 4101245/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr V Valceliunas v And others set out in the attached schedule Orbital Express Launch Limited (In Administration) — 2026
- Case reference
- 4101245/2025
- Decision date
- 15 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr V Valceliunas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the complaint that Orbital Express Launch Limited (In Administration) failed to meet its collective redundancy consultation duties. The respondent dismissed 20 or more employees at one establishment within 90 days or less. The claimants were dismissed with effect from 18 February 2026. The respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected under section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and to consult them under section 188. The claimants were entitled to bring the complaint because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives. No recognised trade union was involved.
Employment Judge J Hendry issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. No response was received by the deadline of 9 June 2026. The joint administrators, appointed on 18 February 2026, had confirmed by letter dated 29 May 2026 that they consented to the proceedings for a protective award.
The tribunal made a protective award for the claimants dismissed as redundant at the respondent's site at 5/6 Innovation Way, Forres Enterprise Park, Forres. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 18 February 2026. The judgment did not quantify the award in money.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award for failure to arrange the election of employee representatives and consult on collective redundancies. The award covers 90 days' remuneration beginning on 18 February 2026; no monetary sum is specified. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.