Case 4101246/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Chapman v Food & Roll Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101246/2023
- Decision date
- 24 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Chapman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Edinburgh on 20 April 2023, gave oral reasons and entered judgment the same day. It found that Food & Roll Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr J Chapman’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £3,800.
The tribunal also found that, on the termination of his employment, the respondent had failed to make a payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,506.92 in respect of that claim. The judgment records two successful monetary claims and does not set out any separate split between heads of loss beyond those gross sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,800. | Upheld | — | £3,800 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that on termination the respondent failed to pay the claimant for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,506.92. | Upheld | — | £1,507 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,307
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.