Case 4101249/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101249/2019 Mr A McCallum v Represented by: Ms D Reynolds Forth Ports Ltd — 2019

Case reference: 4101249/2019
Decision date: 25 July 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Joseph

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101249/2019 Mr A McCallum

Respondent

Represented by: Ms D Reynolds Forth Ports Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mr A McCallum brought a claim against Forth Ports Ltd described in the judgment as discrimination or victimisation on grounds of sex, marriage or transgender (SXD). The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant.

The judgment therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability were made and no remedy was awarded.

The judgment is brief and records only the procedural disposal of the withdrawn claim. No other claims or monetary awards are set out in the text provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment records a claim of discrimination or victimisation on grounds of sex, marriage or transgender (SXD). It says the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules.	Withdrawn	Sex	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.