Case 4101259/2023 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101259/2023 (P)5 Held at Aberdeen on June 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr T Collin v Represented by Mr A Mackey,15 Solicitor Waves Radio Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101259/2023
- Decision date
- 22 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101259/2023 (P)5 Held at Aberdeen on June 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr T Collin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a case management preliminary hearing on 24 May 2023, the respondent's director, Mr Stafford, confirmed that the sums set out in the judgment were admitted to be due. The tribunal recorded that it had directed payment within 14 days and that, if payment was not made, the claimant could apply for judgment.
By email on 16 June 2023, the claimant's solicitor stated that payment had not been made and asked for judgment to be issued. The tribunal then made judgment in the claimant's favour for unlawful deductions from wages under s.23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in the sum of £3,468.85, damages for breach of contract for failure to give notice of termination in the sum of £1,368, holiday pay of £570, and a redundancy payment of £4,275.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 found well-founded; respondent accepted the sum was due at the case management preliminary hearing on 24 May 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,469 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for failure to give notice of termination of employment; respondent accepted this sum was due at the preliminary hearing. | Upheld | — | £1,368 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for holiday pay found well-founded; respondent accepted the sum was due. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded; respondent accepted the sum was due. | Upheld | — | £4,275 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,682
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.