Case 4101263/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N S Munro v NES North Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101263/2020
- Decision date
- 6 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N S Munro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Susan Walker issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that NES North Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr N S Munro’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,914.78.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract in respect of unpaid expenses and ordered the respondent to pay £114.30 by way of damages. The judgment does not split the awards further or record any additional findings beyond those two financial remedies.
The hearing listed for 3 July 2020 was cancelled. The judgment was dated 27 April 2020 and entered in the register on 6 May 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent प्रस्तुत? No response was presented; the Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. | Upheld | — | £1,915 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for breach of contract in respect of unpaid expenses. No response was presented and judgment was issued under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £114 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,029
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.