Case 4101267/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101267/2015 & Others Mr JM Aviss & Others v S & JD Robertson North Air Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4101267/2015
- Decision date
- 1 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101267/2015 & Others Mr JM Aviss & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a multiple-claim judgment in which the tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted judgment text does not set out any substantive findings on liability, facts in dispute, or remedy. It is a short procedural disposal only, and no award was made.
The judgment was dated 30 July 2018 and entered in the register and copied to the parties on 1 August 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not identify the substantive cause of action for the claims, although the GOV.UK listing category for the case is Working Time Regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.