Case 4101269/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Leighton v Represented by:15 Mr P McGregor Solicitor Balnacraig Farm and Estates Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101269/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Leighton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Gavin Leighton was employed by Balnacraig Farm and Estates Limited after signing a new contract on 27 September 2019. On 25 October 2019, while working at Gibliston House, he raised concerns about another person using a chain saw without PPE in circumstances he considered harmful or potentially harmful to health and safety. The tribunal accepted his evidence as credible and reliable, including the supporting emails, payslips and appeal documents.
The tribunal found that Mr Leighton reasonably brought health and safety concerns to the employer's attention and that he was summarily dismissed by Mr Andrew Morris immediately after doing so, without any disciplinary process. It held that section 100(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was breached, and also found that the situation involved serious and imminent danger within section 100(1)(d). The tribunal also noted that the respondent's appeal response failed to address the statutory position. It awarded compensation under section 123 on the basis of 21 weeks' loss, using weekly net pay plus pension contributions to reach £8,921.43, and then applied a 10% uplift of £892.14 for a complete failure to follow the ACAS Code, producing a compensatory award of £9,813.57.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the holiday year ran with the calendar year, that the claimant had taken three weeks' leave, and that he had a balance of 13 days outstanding at termination. It awarded £1,104.61 as an unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal reserved the question of a financial penalty under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 for 14 days to allow written representations, so no penalty formed part of the final award recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that Mr Leighton was automatically unfairly dismissed in breach of section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 after he raised health and safety concerns about chain saw use without PPE. It found breaches of section 100(1)(c) and 100(1)(d) and awarded a compensatory sum of £9,813.57, including a 10% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code. | Upheld | — | £9,814 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in respect of untaken holiday pay. It calculated 13 days' holiday outstanding at a daily rate of £84.97, resulting in an award of £1,104.61. | Upheld | — | £1,105 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,918
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,814
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.100(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.100(1)(d) ERA 1996
- s.123 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- Regulations 13, 13A and 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.207A TULR(C)A 1992
- s.12A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.