Case 4101289/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101289/2022 Mr D Barnas v Holdings Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101289/2022
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101289/2022 Mr D Barnas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Laura Doherty decided the case without a hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 11 May 2022.
The tribunal found that 94 Holdings Ltd had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr D Barnas £920.00 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars. It ordered the respondent to pay a further £920.00 gross on that head of claim. The judgment does not record any additional remedy components beyond those two gross sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £920.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £920 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars and ordered £920.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £920 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,840
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.