Case 4101295/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4101295/2015 Mr J Drummond v Progress Rail Services UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101295/2015
- Decision date
- 16 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4101295/2015 Mr J Drummond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 December 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 20 December 2024, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason in response and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024, on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d). No substantive merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action. The case was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38
- rule 38(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.