Case 4101301/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Craig v Unrepresented North Lanarkshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4101301/2016
- Decision date
- 27 February 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Craig
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of the claim. On 10 February 2017, it gave Mr B Craig an opportunity to provide written reasons by 17 February 2017, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
Mr Craig did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, relying on rule 37(1)(d).
No remedy was awarded because the claim was struck out before any substantive liability findings were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not describe the substantive pleadings, but the case listing identifies the matter as an Equal Pay Act claim. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.