Case 4101306/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101306/2015 Mr G Hynes v NCR Financial Solutions Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101306/2015
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101306/2015 Mr G Hynes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr G Hynes's claim against NCR Financial Solutions Group Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
In support of that conclusion, the tribunal noted that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address provided had been returned marked "gone away" and that no new address had been provided. The claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting for him and did not hold any other address for him beyond the one in the claim form.
On that basis, the tribunal said it appeared that the claim was not being actively pursued and therefore ordered that it be struck out. No substantive merits decision or remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying substantive claim type; it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.