Case 4101318/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Murphy v Timber Doors & Windows Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101318/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Murphy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J Murphy, brought a complaint for a redundancy payment against Timber Doors & Windows Ltd. The respondent presented a response but indicated that no part of the claim was contested. The Employment Judge therefore determined the matter without a hearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the material before the tribunal, Mr Murphy's employment ended by reason of redundancy. The tribunal found that he was entitled to a redundancy payment and awarded £6,092.30, calculated as 16.5 weeks' pay. The judgment states that this sum was worked out by reference to the claimant's age of 58, his 11 years' service, and his gross weekly pay of £369.23. The final hearing listed for 15 July was cancelled because the claim had been determined in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent indicated that no part of the claim was contested. The tribunal determined liability without a hearing under Rule 21 and awarded a redundancy payment of £6,092.30. | Upheld | — | £6,092 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,092
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.