Case 4101344/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101344/2023 Mr R Hoggan v Giddy GD Ltd t/a The Giddy Goose — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101344/2023
- Decision date
- 19 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4101344/2023 Mr R Hoggan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 19 April 2023, Employment Judge I McFatridge struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment states that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success within rule 37(1)(a).
The judgment does not determine any remedy for the unfair dismissal claim. It states that the remaining claims would proceed to the hearing already fixed, but no further outcome for those claims is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success under rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37 ET Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.