Case 4101347/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Ross v The Richmond Fellowship Scotland — 2024
- Case reference
- 4101347/2015
- Decision date
- 18 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Ross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in Scotland, before Employment Judge L Wiseman, struck out Ms J Ross's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons state that on 4 December 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 18 December 2024, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No monetary award or further substantive findings were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify a separate outcome for this substantive category; the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify a separate outcome for this substantive category; the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.