Case 4101352/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Juan Jose Martin Ripoll st Named v La Casa Leith Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101352/2020
- Decision date
- 21 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Juan Jose Martin Ripoll st Named
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at Glasgow on 16 October 2020 before Employment Judge Hoey. The respondent did not attend. Both claimants attended with their adviser and an interpreter. The tribunal noted that the respondent had been given time to challenge the sums and calculations but did not do so, and the claimants confirmed that the amounts claimed were accurate and that the relevant work had been done and annual leave accrued.
For the first claimant, the tribunal found that he had not been paid for his final day of work on 16 December 2019. It held that 8 hours were unpaid and that £65.68 gross was due, amounting to an unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found that he had taken no annual leave during employment and had accrued 108.2 hours of untaken holiday, for which £888.33 gross was due under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
For the second claimant, the tribunal found that the proper sum due for work done between 29 July 2019 and 25 August 2019 was £3,042 net, that she had been paid £1,900 net, and that £1,142 net remained outstanding. It accepted the calculation that this equated to £1,472.50 gross and held that this was an unlawful deduction from wages. It further found that she had accrued 41.3 hours of untaken annual leave and was entitled to £640.14 gross under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The claimants also sought damages for emotional upset, but the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction or power to award such sums. The judgment therefore consisted only of the four monetary awards: £65.68 and £888.33 for the first claimant, and £1,472.50 and £640.14 for the second claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant: the tribunal found he was unpaid for 8 hours worked on 16 December 2019 and treated this as an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £66 |
| Working time regulations | First claimant: the tribunal found he had accrued 108.2 hours of untaken annual leave and was owed £888.33 gross under regulation 14(2) WTR 1998. | Upheld | — | £888 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant: the tribunal found the respondent had not paid the full amount properly due for work between 29 July 2019 and 25 August 2019; the outstanding sum was treated as an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,473 |
| Working time regulations | Second claimant: the tribunal found she had accrued 41.3 hours of untaken annual leave and was owed £640.14 gross under regulation 14(2) WTR 1998. | Upheld | — | £640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,067
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulations 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.