Case 4101355/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4101355/2015 Ms L McGowan v The Richmond Fellowship Scotland — 2025
- Case reference
- 4101355/2015
- Decision date
- 16 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4101355/2015 Ms L McGowan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge L Wiseman struck out Ms L McGowan's claim against The Richmond Fellowship Scotland under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. On 19 December 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 3 January 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a substantive claim type in the extracted text; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 38 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.