Case 4101376/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101376/2023 Ms R Nixeaman v The Democratic Society Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101376/2023
- Decision date
- 3 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101376/2023 Ms R Nixeaman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent was The Democratic Society Ltd, stated to be in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation.
On the material before the tribunal, the claimant succeeded on an unauthorised deduction from wages claim. The judgment recorded that £7,735.18 was due, comprising £6,368.60 as the net sum owed after sums already paid by the respondent and £1,348.58 for employee pension contributions.
The claimant also succeeded on two breach of contract claims. The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,392.19. It further held that the respondent failed to pay expenses in breach of contract and ordered payment of £182.00. The total sum ordered was £10,309.37.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £7,735.18, made up of £6,368.60 net after sums already paid plus £1,348.58 for employee pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £7,735 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,392.19. | Upheld | — | £2,392 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay expenses in breach of contract and ordered payment of £182.00. | Upheld | — | £182 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,309
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.