Case 4101378/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Fraser v EE Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4101378/2023
- Decision date
- 5 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Fraser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, alleging that he had been dismissed within section 95(1)(c), commonly referred to as constructive dismissal. He accepted at the hearing that the claim had been lodged out of time, so the issue was whether the Tribunal should exercise its discretion to hear it out of time.
The Tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 25 March 2022, meaning the normal time limit expired on 24 June 2022. ACAS Early Conciliation was not started until 20 January 2023 and the ET1 was presented on 3 February 2023. The claimant had known there was a three-month time limit and accepted that it had been possible to lodge the claim in time. His explanation was that he was waiting for a full response to a data subject access request, but the Tribunal found this did not make it not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time.
The Tribunal also considered the further delay after the claimant received the DSAR response on 30 June 2022. It found that waiting a further seven to eight months while an internal grievance process continued was not a reasonable further period. The Tribunal therefore did not exercise its discretion to hear the claim out of time and dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time and the Tribunal declined to hear it out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
13 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.111(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable test
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- London International College v Sen
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Wall's Meat Co Ltd v Khan
- Avon County Council v Haywood-Hicks
- Westward Circuits Ltd v Read
- Northumberland County Council v Thompson
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.