Case 4101379/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101379/2014 & Others (per attached schedule) Mr J Hailes and Others v Represented by: Thompsons South Lanarkshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4101379/2014
- Decision date
- 1 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101379/2014 & Others (per attached schedule) Mr J Hailes and Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. Following that withdrawal, the claims were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment contains no substantive adjudication on the merits of the equal pay claims and no findings about liability or remedy. It attaches a multiple schedule listing the claimants and case numbers against South Lanarkshire Council.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. The gov.uk category identifies the matter as Equal Pay Act; the judgment itself does not set out substantive issues. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.