Case 4101403/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 113045/2011 & others (per attached schedule) Mrs J Burns & others v Represented by: D M Legal Claims Ltd South Lanarkshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4101403/2014
- Decision date
- 9 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 113045/2011 & others (per attached schedule) Mrs J Burns & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis multiple-schedule judgment dated 9 May 2019, issued by Employment Judge Frances Eccles, lists case 4101403/2014, Mr Angus le Blond v South Lanarkshire Council, among a group of equal pay claims. The tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the withdrawn claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not record any merits findings or any monetary award for this case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The case is listed in a multiple-schedule equal pay judgment. The claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.