Case 4101414/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101414/2019 Unite The Union v Represented by: Mr G F Bathgate, Solicitor Sisters Poultry Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 4101414/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian Mcfatridge
Parties
3 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101414/2019 Unite The Union
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this judgment dated 29 October 2020, Employment Judge Ian Mcfatridge recorded only a procedural disposal. The claim as directed against the first respondent had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed as against the first respondent only under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, and it does not record any award or remedy. It also does not record any disposal in relation to the second respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim as directed against the first respondent had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed as against the first respondent only under Rule 52. No merits determination or remedy is recorded, and the judgment does not address the second respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.