Case 4101434/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4101434/2020 Final Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on 24-28 May 2021 Members – Mr S Singh & Ms N Elliot Employment Judge - A Strain Mr T Kinghorn v Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4101434/2020
- Decision date
- 14 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alan Strain
- Panel members
- Mr S Singh, Ms N Elliot
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4101434/2020 Final Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on 24-28 May 2021 Members – Mr S Singh & Ms N Elliot Employment Judge - A Strain Mr T Kinghorn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed by First Glasgow (No 1) Ltd. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was not directly discriminated against on the basis of sex and/or age. Those discrimination claims were dismissed. The written judgment records that oral reasons were provided to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and the unfair dismissal claim is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states the claimant was not directly discriminated against on the basis of sex and the claim is dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states the claimant was not directly discriminated against on the basis of age and the claim is dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.