Case 4101438/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Graham Breckney v X Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101438/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Graham Breckney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard remotely on 12 May 2022. The respondent did not lodge a response form and did not appear, so the case proceeded undefended. The tribunal heard evidence from Mr Graham Breckney and found him to be credible and reliable. He had been employed by X402 Ltd from 1 October 2017 as Head of Quality Assurance and was told in early October 2021 that he was being dismissed for redundancy; he worked his notice and his employment ended on 5 November 2021.
On the redundancy claim, the tribunal found that the claimant was over 41 for all of his service and had four complete years' service. His gross weekly pay of £769.23 exceeded the statutory cap, so the redundancy payment was calculated using £544 as the relevant week's pay under the statutory formula. The tribunal awarded £3,264, being four years multiplied by 1.5 multiplied by £544. It noted that this matched the figure shown on the amended payslip and that the sum was not taxable.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the claimant had accrued but untaken annual leave at termination, including five days of public holidays and additional leave shown on the amended payslip, totalling £1,384.63. It treated the non-payment as an unlawful deduction from wages under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and awarded that sum subject to any necessary statutory deduction. The overall award was £4,648.63.
The tribunal also considered whether to impose a financial penalty under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. It said there were aggravating features because the respondent had accepted that the sums were due but had not paid them, and it deferred the penalty question for 14 days to allow written submissions on ability to pay and on whether payment had since been made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated using four complete years' service, age 41+ throughout service, and the £544 statutory week's pay cap. | Upheld | — | £3,264 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken annual leave at termination; the judgment described the non-payment as an unlawful deduction from wages under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,649
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.136 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.139 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.162 Employment Rights Act 1996
- ss.212-214 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.12A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.