Case 4101455/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr V Mccluskey v North Lanarkshire Council, Education and Families — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101455/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr V Mccluskey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short jurisdiction judgment in which Employment Judge F Eccles recorded that the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider Mr V Mccluskey's unfair dismissal claim against North Lanarkshire Council, Education and Families. The respondent was represented by Ms S Raza, solicitor, and the claimant appeared in person.
The judgment does not contain findings on the substantive merits of the dismissal complaint, any liability analysis, or any monetary award. It is confined to the preliminary issue of jurisdiction and therefore leaves the underlying unfair dismissal claim to be determined separately if pursued.
No discrimination, whistleblowing, redundancy, wages, or contract claims are identified in the text supplied, and no legal test is expressly set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment only records that the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the claim of unfair dismissal. It does not decide the merits of the dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.