Case 4101461/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101461/2022 Ms L Barr v Mr Alan Alexander Forrest t/a Torrance Cars — 2022
- Case reference
- 4101461/2022
- Decision date
- 22 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4101461/2022 Ms L Barr
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment dated 21 April 2022, Employment Judge Muriel Robison recorded that Ms L Barr's complaints of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract (notice pay), failure to provide a statement of terms and conditions, and failure to issue itemised pay statements all succeeded. The judgment does not set out substantive reasons for each claim in the extracted text; it records only that the claims were upheld.
The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a hearing. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided, and no split between the individual claims is given.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide statement of terms and conditions succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to issue itemised pay statements succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.